Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera or BMPCC 6K is an incredible piece of equipment that shoots breathtaking cinematic videos. It is a full-fledged filmmaking camera with exceptional RAW shooting capabilities. Sigma fp, on the other hand, is the world’s smallest full-frame mirrorless camera (at the time of this writing). fp redefined the possibilities of a small camera with its arrival. It is a beast in still photography and video making. Let’s compare BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp and see where one outshines the other.
Price Comparison | BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
| Camera Model | Pricing & Availability |
|---|---|
| BMPCC 6K | Check Current Price |
| Sigma fp | Check Current Price |
BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
Body
This is an unavoidable topic between BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp. Even though BMPCC has pocket camera mentioned in its name, it does not fit into any pocket. Sigma fp on the other hand as a very small body and will fit into any pocket on your clothes. This is an incredible opportunity for travelers/photographers. Given that Sigma fp can also shoot photos, clubbed with the 4K recording capabilities, Sigma fp can be a very good travel companion for you.
Sigma fp is smaller, make sure that you can hold the camera with a good grip. If the grip does not feel comfortable, there are adaptors that can give you a nice grip on the camera.
Winner: Sigma fp (Amazon)
Sensor Size | BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
BMPCC 6K features a Super 35 sensor whereas Sigma fp equips a larger full-frame sensor. Even with smaller sensor size, BMPCC 6K features a larger pixel count. On the other hand, Sigma fp supports larger pixels than the BMPCC 6K which in result, offers slightly better sensitivity towards light. The larger sensor size, clubbed with the larger pixels of the Sigma fp makes it a better performer in low light.
Winner: Sigma fp (Amazon)
Autofocus
Sigma fp has a better autofocus system, contrast-shift AF system, than the BMPCC 6K. You cannot rely on BMPCC 6K in terms of AF at all. It will suit you best only if you are a full-manual user. This drawback can seriously affect those who are not familiar with manual focusing. But this doesn’t mean that BMPCC 6K can’t produce incredible videos, you just got to master this skill.
Winner: Sigma fp (Amazon)
Dynamic Range
Blackmagic BMPCC 6K features a dynamic range up to 13 stops whereas the Sigma fp supports up to 12.5 stops. Even though there is only a slight difference in the dynamic range, BMPCC produces a superior video quality that lets the user recover clipped highlights very efficiently.
Winner: BMPCC 6K (Amazon)
Video Recording Capability | BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
Sigma fp can record 4K videos only up to 30 fps whereas BMPCC 6K can record 6K RAW videos up to 60 fps with Blackmagic RAW and that too internally. 6K videos from BMPCC 6K look astonishing and give a lot of room for editing in post-production. Note that even with an external recorder, Sigma fp can shoot 4K videos up to 30 fps only supporting 4:2:2 12-bit color depth. Both of the cameras can shoot FHD videos up to 120 fps for buttery smooth slow-motion effects.
Winner: BMPCC 6K (Amazon)
Specifications | BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
| Feature | BMPCC 6K | Sigma fp |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 23.1 x 12.99 mm (Super 35) | 35.9 x 23.9 mm full frame |
| Resolution | 6144 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF | Leica L |
| ISO (Extended) | 100 to 25600 | 100 to 25600 |
| Still Image Capability | Very poor | Excellent |
| Dynamic Range | 13 stops | 12.5 stops |
| 6K Video Recording | Yes | None |
| RAW Support (internal) | 6144 x 3456 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50 fps (49 to 483 MB/s) 6144 x 2560 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps (37 to 359 MB/s) 5744 x 3024 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/50/59.94/60 fps (40 to 395 MB/s) | No |
| Other Video Recording Options | ProRes 422HQ 3840 x 2160p at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps (22.4 to 110 Mb/s) ProRes 422 3840 x 2160p at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps (73.6 MB/s) ProRes 422LT 3840 x 2160p at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps (51 MB/s) 1920 x 1080p at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60/120 fps (12.75 MB/s) | H.264 3840 x 2160 at 23.976, 25, 29.97 fps H.264 1920 x 1080 at 23.976, 25, 29.97, 59.94, 100, 119.88 fps |
| External Recording | 4:2:2 10-Bit via HDMI:1920 x 1080p at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps Via USB: 6144 x 3456 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50 fps 6144 x 2560 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps 5744 x 3024 at 23.98/24/25/29.97/30/50/59.94/60 fps | 4:2:2: 12-Bit 3840 x 2160 at 23.976, 25, 29.97 fps 1920 x 1080 at 23.976, 25, 29.97, 59.94, 100, 120 fps |
| Encoding Formats | ProRes 422HQ, ProRes 422, ProRes 422LT, ProRes 422 Proxy, Blacmagic RAW | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Screen | 5″ LCD monitor | 3.2″ LCD Monitor |
| Weight | 898 g | 422 g |
| Dimensions | 7 x 4 x 3.8″ / 177.8 x 101.6 x 96.52 mm | 4.45 x 2.76 x 1.77″ / 113 x 70 x 45 mm |
| Price | Check Price | Check Price |
Conclusion | Blackmagic BMPCC 6K vs Sigma fp
BMPCC 6K is a full-fledged video camera, but you cannot expect outstanding still photos from it. However, you can still export decent images from the high-resolution video. The excellent video quality clubbed with the Blackmagic RAW ability and the dynamic range can produce cinematic videos. You can start from scratch with the RAW video, boost up the colors, recover details, color grade it without losing quality. Shooting RAW videos is unfortunately not possible with Sigma fp.
Sigma fp on the other hand is a traveler’s companion. The light-weight, & small-sized Sigma fp can shoot impressive images and decent 4K videos while you travel. It weighs only half as much as a BMPCC 6K. Its incredible creative video/photo modes let you bring beautiful results without actually spending any time on post-processing. Although Sigma fp can capture 4K 12-bit 4:2:2 videos externally, it still cannot match the video recording capabilities of Blackmagic BMPCC 6K.
So which camera is better for filmmaking? – Blackmagic BMPCC 6K (Check Price)
Relevant Comparison:
